By Luther Weeks on December 28, 2011
This is seriously dangerous. If you don’t join Americans Elect, their vote could determine the President. If you do join Americans Elect, the vote could be manipulated in the backroom or by hackers. Or the self-appointed board could override the actual vote.
Posted in Internet Voting, National, Skulduggery and Errors
By Luther Weeks on December 24, 2011
Director of TrueVoteCT – Unstoppable Activist – Friend
Posted in CT
By Luther Weeks on December 23, 2011
We have often articulated our concerns with Instant Run-Off Voting also often called Ranked-Choice Voting. This article from the New York Times provides some further confirmation of our concerns
Posted in Instant Runoff Voting
By Luther Weeks on December 19, 2011
Hackers threaten Presidential Primary. The particular threat may or may not be real. Yet, being concerned with electronic skulduggery is Right, Left, and Center
Posted in National, Skulduggery and Errors
By Luther Weeks on December 19, 2011
This is serious stuff. The words that come to mind are: Illegal, unacceptable, unconscionable, ridiculous, unconstitutional, and undemocratic.
Posted in Electronic Vulnerability, National, Our Editorials, Post-Election Audits, Skulduggery and Errors
By Luther Weeks on December 14, 2011
Posted in CT
By Luther Weeks on December 9, 2011
With anecdotal evidence and rational speculation, we introduce the ZigZag Conjecture which may randomly “help” determine election winners and losers in Connecticut.
Posted in CT
By Luther Weeks on December 4, 2011
There is no agreed upon level of difference that would be considered “statistically insignificant” in Connecticut.
In another nearby town officials are concerned about the cost of audits.
Posted in CT, Post-Election Audits
By Luther Weeks on November 29, 2011
There should be an investigation, however, we suggest that determining the cause is not a complete cure. I could happen again. It could have happened in the past. Maybe in Connecticut.
Posted in CT, Electronic Vulnerability, National, Post-Election Audits, Recounts/Recanvasses
By Luther Weeks on November 26, 2011
From Aspen we have a discussion of the value of anonymous ballots and the meaning of the secret ballot. What voting free from coercion requires is the secret casting of ballots and the ongoing safeguarding of those ballots along with the anonymity of the voter associated with each ballot.
Posted in Chain of Custody, CT, National