<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CTVotersCount.org &#187; Mail/Absentee Voting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ctvoterscount.org/category/index/mail-voting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ctvoterscount.org</link>
	<description>because Connecticut voters count</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 15:45:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Since it is safe to send cash in the mail, why shouldn&#8217;t we vote by mail?</title>
		<link>http://www.ctvoterscount.org/since-it-is-safe-to-send-cash-in-the-mail-why-shouldnt-we-vote-by-mail/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ctvoterscount.org/since-it-is-safe-to-send-cash-in-the-mail-why-shouldnt-we-vote-by-mail/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 17:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luther Weeks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mail/Absentee Voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Skulduggery and Errors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctvoterscount.org/?p=6820</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img class="alignright" alt="" src="http://photos1.fotosearch.com/bthumb/CSP/CSP991/k12208560.jpg" width="170" height="113" />Many people despite the evidence keep insisting that mail or absentee voting is safe. But would you really send cash in the mail? If not why would you send your vote that way, unless it was absolutely necessary?

Prosecutor: 'Absentee voting is the source of all voter fraud']]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ctvoterscount.org/since-it-is-safe-to-send-cash-in-the-mail-why-shouldnt-we-vote-by-mail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LA: Two campigns debate absentee ballot fraud. Meanwhile in Hartford and New Haven plans to prove early voting works.</title>
		<link>http://www.ctvoterscount.org/la-two-campigns-debate-absentee-ballot-fraud-meanwhile-in-hartford-and-new-haven-plans-to-prove-early-voting-works/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ctvoterscount.org/la-two-campigns-debate-absentee-ballot-fraud-meanwhile-in-hartford-and-new-haven-plans-to-prove-early-voting-works/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 12:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luther Weeks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legislature2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mail/Absentee Voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctvoterscount.org/?p=6767</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In La, apparently there is evidence and no disagreement that fraud occurred. The issue is which campaign did it. Maybe it is both? Absentee voting is a convenience, not just for voters, it really helps fraudsters as well.

Cash strapped New Haven would be a bad place to test early voting in 2013. It is the first competitive election in New Haven in 20 years. Turnout is all but guaranteed to increase - early voting or not - we can predict that early voting would get the credit. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ctvoterscount.org/la-two-campigns-debate-absentee-ballot-fraud-meanwhile-in-hartford-and-new-haven-plans-to-prove-early-voting-works/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Absentee/Mail-In voting in the news again</title>
		<link>http://www.ctvoterscount.org/absenteemail-in-voting-in-the-news-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ctvoterscount.org/absenteemail-in-voting-in-the-news-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 May 2013 12:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luther Weeks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mail/Absentee Voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctvoterscount.org/?p=6754</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today we have two reports highlighting the worst of the risks. i.e. mass mail voting, sending ballots unsolicited to voters and tracking ballots to voters, completely eliminating the secret vote. One good thing about tracking, apparently it shows dramatically the problems with error and fraud, as well as the lack of official concern with integrity.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ctvoterscount.org/absenteemail-in-voting-in-the-news-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bills Approved Earlier by the GAE Committee</title>
		<link>http://www.ctvoterscount.org/more-bills-appproved-through-the-gae-committee/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ctvoterscount.org/more-bills-appproved-through-the-gae-committee/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Apr 2013 10:05:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luther Weeks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet Voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislature2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mail/Absentee Voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Popular Vote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Post-Election Audits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctvoterscount.org/?p=6730</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img class="alignright" alt="" src="http://ctvoterscount.org/images/ThumbsUpDown.jpg" width="168" height="95" />As promised, comments on earlier bills passed through the Government Administration and Elections Committee.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ctvoterscount.org/more-bills-appproved-through-the-gae-committee/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Groundhog Deja Vue for Fax, Email Voting</title>
		<link>http://www.ctvoterscount.org/deja-vueground-hog-day-for-fax-email-voting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ctvoterscount.org/deja-vueground-hog-day-for-fax-email-voting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2013 11:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luther Weeks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet Voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislature2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mail/Absentee Voting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctvoterscount.org/?p=6667</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now we have it, a redrafted S.B. 647. We do not know who was involved around the table rewriting it, yet what we have is almost an exact copy of the bill Governor Malloy vetoed last year as risky and unconstitutional.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ctvoterscount.org/deja-vueground-hog-day-for-fax-email-voting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Testimony: Polling Place Posting, Enforcement, Early Voting, and Internet Voting</title>
		<link>http://www.ctvoterscount.org/testimony-on-two-bills/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ctvoterscount.org/testimony-on-two-bills/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 15:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luther Weeks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet Voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislature2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mail/Absentee Voting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctvoterscount.org/?p=6598</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday, in the midst of the gun control hearings drawing a couple thousand, we spent an hour in a snowy entrance line to testify on two bills before the Government Elections and Administration Committee. We had planned on testifying on H.B. 5600, however, with many testifying on H.J. 16, I offered additional information to the Committee on that bill and on Internet voting, which was also discussed.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ctvoterscount.org/testimony-on-two-bills/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dummies&#8217; Guide to Rigging a Colorado Election</title>
		<link>http://www.ctvoterscount.org/dummies-guide-to-rigging-a-colorado-election/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ctvoterscount.org/dummies-guide-to-rigging-a-colorado-election/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 16:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luther Weeks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mail/Absentee Voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Skulduggery and Errors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctvoterscount.org/?p=6560</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not everything that Marilyn recommends would work quite the same or as well in Connecticut. A strategy for Connecticut insider election thieves would be to rig memory cards and then  provide incomplete post-election audit reports, or to claim that any discrepancy in such reports between machine and hand counts is human error. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ctvoterscount.org/dummies-guide-to-rigging-a-colorado-election/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Grand Theft Absentee</title>
		<link>http://www.ctvoterscount.org/grand-theft-absentee/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ctvoterscount.org/grand-theft-absentee/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2012 11:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luther Weeks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mail/Absentee Voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Skulduggery and Errors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctvoterscount.org/?p=6539</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“Of the three methods of voting, the one that has always been the most vulnerable, the one where we know fraud has occurred historically ... is in the absentee-ballot process,” Fernández Rundle told The Miami Herald on Thursday, referring also to voting early and on Election Day. Absentee voting, she added, “happens in the shadows. It happens in the dark. It’s the least monitored.”]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ctvoterscount.org/grand-theft-absentee/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What We Worry? What Could Go Wrong On Election Day?</title>
		<link>http://www.ctvoterscount.org/what-we-worry-what-could-go-wrong-on-election-day/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ctvoterscount.org/what-we-worry-what-could-go-wrong-on-election-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2012 12:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luther Weeks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electronic Vulnerability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mail/Absentee Voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Popular Vote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Post-Election Audits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recounts/Recanvasses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctvoterscount.org/?p=6436</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[America's elections are run entirely on the honor system. What could possibly go wrong?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ctvoterscount.org/what-we-worry-what-could-go-wrong-on-election-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Caltech/MIT: What has changed, what hasn&#8217;t, &amp; what needs improvement</title>
		<link>http://www.ctvoterscount.org/caltechmit-what-has-changed-what-hasnt-what-needs-improvement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ctvoterscount.org/caltechmit-what-has-changed-what-hasnt-what-needs-improvement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 14:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luther Weeks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Electronic Vulnerability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mail/Absentee Voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Popular Vote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Post-Election Audits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctvoterscount.org/?p=6418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Caltech/MIT Voting Technology Project has released a thorough, comprehensive, and insightful new report timed to the 2012 election. We find little to quibble with in the report. We agree with all of its recommendations.Several items with which we fully endorse were covered in this report which sometimes are missing from the discussion or often underemphasised.

The report itself is 52 pages, followed by 32 pages of opinions of others, including election officials, advocates, and vendors, some of whom disagree with some aspects of the report. Every page is worth reading. The report is not technical. It covers a wide range of issues, background, and recommendations.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ctvoterscount.org/caltechmit-what-has-changed-what-hasnt-what-needs-improvement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
